Are the equipment standards too stringent or even relevant?

Written By: Lance Piatt

Are the equipment standards too stringent or even relevant?

Many believe (as you probably know) that the standards are too heavy-handed with safety factors that are too extreme.  I reply by reminding them how difficult it is for some departments to procure and maintain equipment because of funding, budgetary protocol and administrative complacency. Long campaign incidents (like earthquakes) can cause fire companies to rely on equipment that wears out as the incident drags on. Specifying extra heavy duty equipment may overcome these downside factors and allow Firefighters to be confident in the strength of their equipment even if it’s getting a little dog-eared.


Many inquiries are from Firefighters concerned that their departments don’t really comply with NFPA training standards when assigning personnel to positions with a rescue mission. My replies are usually along the lines of keeping them encouraged and reminding them that the “Old Guard” will eventually retire out to allow the newer blood to reshape paradigms, but in their meantime, I stress the importance of understanding current standards and applying them whenever they can.
In some cases, fans write to ask about terms or “identifiers”.  A recent inquiry was about the proper term for a basket-raising haul system on a steep angle with an overhead track line to clear obstacles.  Wanted to know whether it should be called a “guide line” or a “track line”.  I referred to Reed Thorne’s teachings and told him it would commonly be referred to as a track line and the raising system might be considered a control line. But I told him I don’t really like splitting those kinds of hairs, and that if his team wants to call it a guide line then so be it.

Tom Briggs-Vertical Academy


About The Author:

9 thoughts on “Are the equipment standards too stringent or even relevant?”

  1. 452943 734616Youre so right. Im there with you. Your blog is surely worth a read if anyone comes throughout it. Im lucky I did because now Ive obtained a complete new view of this. I didnt realise that this issue was so important and so universal. You absolutely put it in perspective for me. 819325

  2. 171885 933853Hey there! Someone in my Myspace group shared this internet site with us so I came to take a look. Im certainly enjoying the data. Im bookmarking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Superb weblog and outstanding style and style. 812970

  3. 366033 741190I enjoyed reading your pleasant web site. I see you offer priceless information. stumbled into this website by chance but Im confident glad I clicked on that link. You certainly answered all of the questions Ive been dying to answer for some time now. Will definitely come back for more of this. 423247

  4. 278589 284831If your real buddies know you as your nickname, use that nickname as your 1st name online. When you 1st friend someone, focus on making a individual comment that weaves connection. 996937

Comments are closed.