CMC MPD in the Inside 9 MA
The Multi-Purpose Device (MPD) from CMC is specifically designed for rope rescue and mechanical advantage systems. It combines multiple functions—progress capture, descent control, and belay capabilities—into a single device.
Advantages:
- Integrated Progress Capture: The MPD’s built-in cam eliminates the need for a separate Prusik or progress capture pulley, reducing clutter in the system.
- Efficient Rope Handling: The MPD is optimized for use in systems like the Inside 9 MA, offering smooth transitions between hauling and lowering modes.
- Ease of Use: Intuitive design reduces complexity during high-stress operations.
- High Efficiency: The MPD minimizes friction losses, maximizing the mechanical advantage of the system.
Challenges:
- Heavier and bulkier than some alternatives.
- May require more practice to master due to its multifunctionality.
Petzl ID in the Inside 9 MA
The Petzl ID is a versatile descender and rope control device widely used in rope access and rescue scenarios. While it is primarily a descender, its locking cam and smooth rope handling make it a candidate for use in mechanical advantage systems.
Advantages:
- Precision Control: The ID offers exceptional control for descent and lowering operations.
- Versatility: Can function as a progress capture device in the Inside 9 MA system, though not its primary purpose.
- Lightweight: More compact than the MPD, making it suitable for teams prioritizing portability.
Challenges:
- Friction Losses: The ID’s efficiency in hauling is slightly lower than that of the MPD due to higher friction at the rope interface.
- Manual Progress Capture: Requires additional components (e.g., Prusiks or a separate progress capture pulley) to match the MPD’s integrated features.
- Specific Setup Requirements: The ID’s use in the Inside 9 MA system often requires more detailed rigging knowledge.
Direct Comparison in the Inside 9 MA Context
| Feature |
CMC MPD |
Petzl ID |
| Progress Capture |
Integrated cam |
Requires separate component |
| Ease of Use |
Intuitive, multi-functional |
Slightly steeper learning curve |
| Rope Efficiency |
Minimal friction losses |
Moderate friction losses |
| Weight & Portability |
Heavier |
Lightweight |
| Versatility |
Designed for rescue applications |
Best for descent/lowering |
| Cost |
Higher price point |
More affordable |
Which Is Better?
The choice between the CMC MPD and Petzl ID in an Inside 9 MA system depends on mission requirements, user familiarity, and equipment priorities:
- CMC MPD is ideal for:
- Teams that need an all-in-one device for hauling, belaying, and lowering.
- Scenarios where reducing system complexity is crucial.
- Operations that prioritize efficiency and robustness over portability.
- Petzl ID is ideal for:
- Teams familiar with integrating multiple components into a system.
- Situations where weight and cost are significant considerations.
- Scenarios focused on descent control and lighter loads.
Final Thoughts
The CMC MPD excels in high-efficiency setups like the Inside 9 MA, offering an all-in-one solution with minimal friction and smooth transitions. However, the Petzl ID remains a reliable alternative for teams prioritizing versatility and portability, provided they address its limitations with additional components.
Both devices are exceptional in their own right, and the decision ultimately hinges on the team’s goals, training, and equipment preferences. Regular training and field practice will ensure proficiency with either device, enabling seamless integration into complex systems like the Inside 9 MA.
Comments are closed.